In today’s Major League Baseball, the game has shifted dramatically—it’s all about OPS now, with batting average taking a backseat. But here’s where it gets controversial: Is this evolution a step forward, or are we losing something essential about the sport? Let’s dive in.
When Andrew Benintendi burst onto the MLB scene in 2016, batting average was his North Star. Fresh off a .312 average in the minors, the young outfielder was all about consistency at the plate. Fast forward to 2026, as he enters his fourth season with the Chicago White Sox and his 11th year overall, and the focus has flipped. Now, it’s all about OPS and power numbers—a reflection of how the game has transformed.
And this is the part most people miss: OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging) isn’t just a stat; it’s a philosophy. It prioritizes getting on base and hitting for power over simply making contact. For Benintendi, this shift means rethinking his approach, from swing mechanics to in-game strategy. But is this new emphasis on OPS truly better for the game, or does it overlook the artistry of a well-placed single?
The debate doesn’t end there. While OPS rewards players for being multi-dimensional, some argue it undervalues the skill of pure contact hitters. After all, baseball has always been a game of balance—power and precision, strategy and spontaneity. By hyper-focusing on OPS, are we risking the loss of players who excel in other areas?
As we watch Benintendi and others adapt to this OPS-driven era, it’s worth asking: What does this shift mean for the future of baseball? Is the game evolving for the better, or are we leaving something behind? Let us know your thoughts in the comments—this is one conversation that’s far from over.
